First Look: Samsung Galaxy S8by Matt Humrick on April 21, 2017 8:55 AM EST
- Posted in
- Snapdragon 835
- Galaxy S8
We first saw Samsung’s new 5.8-inch Galaxy S8 and 6.2-inch Galaxy S8+ at its Unpacked event a few weeks ago. During the event, we saw demos of its new virtual assistant, Bixby, and its DeX docking station, which allows the Galaxy S8 to provide a desktop-like experience by connecting to an external monitor and peripherals, but we didn’t have much time with the phones to do much more than take some pictures and try a couple of the new features. After receiving a Galaxy S8 earlier this week, we wanted to give you some feedback about its design and biometric features, as well as, an initial performance and battery life assessment before we dive into our usual in-depth testing.
My biggest complaint about the design is the location of the fingerprint sensor, which I discuss in the video above. It has been relocated to the back next to the camera, making it difficult to reach and use. The new face unlock feature, the second of the S8’s three biometric authentication options, is flawed too. Despite my best efforts, I was not able to get face unlock to work, not even once. The feature, which relies solely on the front-facing camera for identification, also is not very secure, assuming it works at all. It has already been shown that simply holding a picture in front of the camera is enough to fool it into unlocking the phone. The camera really needs to be augmented with an infrared camera to detect a face’s heat signature as a liveness test, or a second, depth-sensing camera to at least detect a face in three dimensions. So far the iris scanner, which I also demo in the video above, has proven to be the easiest and most reliable biometric option.
|Samsung Galaxy S8 Series|
|Samsung Galaxy S8||Samsung Galaxy S8+|
|SoC||Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (US, China, Japan)
4x Kryo 280 Performance @ 2.35GHz
4x Kryo 280 Efficiency @ 1.90GHz
Samsung Exynos 8895 (rest of world)
4x Exynos M2 @ 2.30GHz
4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.70GHz
|Display||5.8-inch 2960x1440 (18.5:9)
SAMOLED (curved edges)
|6.2-inch 2960x1440 (18.5:9)
SAMOLED (curved edges)
|Dimensions||148.9 x 68.1 x 8.0 mm
|159.5 x 73.4 x 8.1 mm
|RAM||4GB LPDDR4 (US)|
|Battery||3000 mAh (11.55 Wh)
|3500 mAh (13.48 Wh)
|Front Camera||8MP, f/1.7, Contrast AF|
|Rear Camera||12MP, 1.4µm pixels, f/1.7, dual-pixel PDAF, OIS, auto HDR, LED flash|
|Modem||Snapdragon X16 LTE (Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 16/13)
Samsung LTE (Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 16/13)
|Wireless||802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2x2 MU-MIMO, BT 5.0 LE, NFC, GPS/Glonass/Galileo/BDS|
|Connectivity||USB Type-C, 3.5mm headset|
|Features||fingerprint sensor, heart-rate sensor, iris scanner, face unlock, fast charging (Qualcomm QC 2.0 or Adaptive Fast Charging), wireless charging (WPC & PMA), IP68, Mobile HDR Premium|
|Launch OS||Android 7.0 with TouchWiz|
Inside the redesigned Galaxy S8 and S8+ is either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 or Samsung Exynos 8895 SoC. The US and other regions that require CDMA capability will get the Snapdragon 835, while the rest of the world will get Samsung’s SoC. The new 10nm SoCs are paired with 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM and 64GB of UFS 2.1 NAND. The Galaxy S8 comes with a 3000mAh battery, the same size as the Galaxy S7, while the S8+ comes with a 3500mAh battery, slightly less than the S7 edge’s 3600mAh capacity.
In PCMark, which is our best indicator of general system performance, the Galaxy S8 with Snapdragon 835 performs quite well, besting even the Mate 9 overall. Because this is the first S835 retail device we’ve tested, I’ve also included Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 835 MDP/S, which the company uses internally for hardware testing and software development, as a reference point. In most of these tests, the Galaxy S8 performs about the same as the Snapdragon 835 MDP/S, which is certainly a good sign.
The Galaxy S8 does particularly well in the Writing test, outscoring the Mate 9 by 13% and the Galaxy S7 (Snapdragon 820) by 85%. The Writing test, which previous Galaxy phones struggle with, uses a fairly bursty workload, frequently migrating threads between the little and big cores. Perhaps this is an indication that Samsung is utilizing the big cores more aggressively than in the past. The Galaxy S8 is also 9% faster than the Mate 9 in the Web Browsing test and 37% faster than the S7 (S820).
The Galaxy S8 achieves over 8 hours of screen-on-time while continuously crunching through the PCMark workloads, 46% longer than the Galaxy S7 that has the same 3000mAh battery, which suggests some nice efficiency gains from the new SoC, display, or other components. While the Galaxy S7 can struggle to last a full day on a single charge depending on how it’s used, these initial results suggest the Galaxy S8 will encounter fewer scenarios where it will need to use its fast charging or wireless charging abilities to stretch battery life till the end of the day.
While we’ve only had the Galaxy S8 for a couple of days, our first impression is generally positive. It’s packed with features, TouchWiz is more refined, and it performed well in our first performance and battery life tests. A few issues are already apparent, however. Your face probably will not be smiling if you try to rely on it to unlock the phone, and the fingerprint sensor is located in just about the worst possible place. Samsung’s Bixby assistant also is not yet fully functional; fortunately, you can still use Google Assistant while you’re waiting for Bixby to mature.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Cakefish - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkI wish you would compare to the Exynos Galaxy S7 also. Comparing it only to the US Snapdragon edition doesn't help non-US readers. This article makes it clear that the Snapdragon 835 performance and battery life is light years ahead of the Snapdragon 820 but what about the Exynos 8890?
As of now, there's a giant elephant in the room.
jrs77 - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkGoogle "Samsung Galaxy S8 red display"...
You would think that they learned their lesson with the batteries in the Note 7.
Anyways... No user-replacable battery no sale. Atleast it has a mSD-slot.
Yongsta - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkThat's like 98% of the phones out there (no user-replaceable battery).
jrs77 - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkI know, and that's why I still use a Nokia 520 and probably will keep using it for the next decade if the hardware doesn't break or I run out of replacement batteries.
Yongsta - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkI guess different use cases. Back when I had a Startac I had extra batteries because it was poor but now I use the phone a full day and still have around 30% before I go to sleep (which I just place on a charger).
jrs77 - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkThe battery of my phone lasts me for a couple of days, as I only use it for making phonecalls, sending texts or listening to some music.
Has nothing to do with replacing batteries on the go, but replacing batteries in the device to extend it's lifetime.
When the battery dies in an iPhone or all of thoose with integrated batteries I need to buy a new phone, instead of just buying a battery for $10-15.
For surfing the web, playing some games etc I carry a 11" notebook, which I need for work anyways.
shabby - Friday, April 21, 2017 - linkJust because a phone doesn't have a removable battery doesn't mean you can't replace it.
jrs77 - Saturday, April 22, 2017 - linkCan I replace it myself without any tools? No. Can I take the battery out so that my phone can't be tracked anymore? No. Can I buy a cheap replacement for $15? No.
See. There's people like me, who use their phones in a different way than the generation X or the millenials. There's people with a brain left.
Icehawk - Sunday, April 23, 2017 - linkApple will replace batteries, it's not cheap but nothing from Cupertino is
Notmyusualid - Monday, April 24, 2017 - link@Yongsta
I don't think that is true.