ASUS Maximus V Formula BIOS

The most important feature in a BIOS design is responsiveness – if an option does not change immediately, or the user has to wait around, no-one is going to like it regardless of what options you put in.  This is unfortunately a poignant truth; discussing with manufacturers about why certain features are not implemented in modern graphical BIOSes brings up the issue of responsiveness - if it will not respond quickly, it cannot go in.  So while it might be nice to have an OS-like or Android-like BIOS system that is highly interactive, it might not work as fast as you would like.  Surely this should not be an issue – we are dealing with systems built around the latest super fast CPUs, so why should choosing an option in the BIOS be slow?  This is all down to the rather legacy way we still deal with the BIOS along with the boot services and old start up POST sequence.  The UEFI 2.1 standard does not actually define a user interface, but rather the Human Interface Infrastructure (HII).  When reading the HII spec, it makes designing a UEFI sound boring - as simply a list of forms and verbose markup languages alongside static images, which is not ideal if you have to fit everything into a 64 Mbit package and make it look amazing.  It makes me wonder how exactly MSI put those games into the early P67 BIOSes.

ASUS tell me they have tested many different ways on how to represent their data.  Of course one design does not please everyone perfectly, and it is hard to add in everything that everyone would like due to the human interaction factor, and the need for everything to work in an instant.  As a result, what you see is what you get – a form based interface with static images, but at least it looks better than most!  ASUS also like to keep options neat and tidy, offering the extreme enthusiasts the ability to tinker, as well as improving compatibility with different types of memory, RAID card et al.

Being an ROG board, first entry into the BIOS is usually to advanced mode, but stepping back out a bit brings us the ROG version of EZ Mode:

The ROG version is essentially a red themed ASUS BIOS, with different text colors, ROG icons, and a red styled background.  We get the important info in EZ mode, such as motherboard in use, BIOS version, CPU name and speed, Memory amount and speed, temperatures, voltages, fan speeds and boot priority.  ASUS adds in a trio of buttons for system performance – from left to right we have energy saving, normal, or performance.  Along the bottom are a series of quick menus, such as shortcuts to areas of advanced mode and straight to the boot menu.  In order to change language, the option is on the top right, although a button on the bottom would also be preferable.

Moving into the Advanced Mode we come across Extreme Tweaker, also known as the ASUS overclocking options.  Almost similar to what we saw in the ASRock Z77 OC Formula, albeit a lot more varied – in order we have the automatic OC options, CPU and memory options, sub menus for DRAM timings and DIGI Power Control, voltage options and finally skew options. 

If you cast your mind back to the BIOS of the ASUS ROG X79 Rampage IV Extreme, we had overclock profiles that catered for different mind sets – the gamer, the overclocker, and the extreme overclocker.  The MVF is a little more reserved here, offering a single “Gamers’ OC Profile” and three/four different options via CPU Level Up when you power the system out of the box.  The Gamers’ OC Profile gives a staggered multiplier overclock across core loading (48/47/46/45), whereas the CPU Level Up options go for a fixed speed overclock (4.6  GHz, 4.4 GHz, 4.2 GHz) – though neither of them deal with memory.

Manual overclockers can set the AI Overclock Tuner option to ‘Manual’ or ‘XMP’, which gives the user access to adjusting the CPU BCLK and multiplier frequencies on both a per-core and all-core basis.  There are additional options for various benchmarking improvements (Xtreme Tweaking/SPI Booster), but all voltage and power options must be performed further down the list.

Underneath the memory selection are a set of four options – DRAM Timing Control, GPU.DIMM Post, CPU Power Management and DIGI Power Control.  The first gives the user access to the subtimings for the memory:

There is also a submenu for ASUS recommended sub-timings if you happen to own particular high end memory kits:

The GPU.DIMM submenu in Extreme Tweaker is a useful feature to determine what GPUs and memory the system actually recognizes at POST.  Thus if a memory stick has failed, or a GPU is running at the wrong lane allocation, it can all be checked here without fiddling around for a couple of hours determining what is wrong.

The CPU Power Management submenu offers options to enable/disable SpeedStep and Turbo Mode, and the DIGI Power Control contains our regular array of ASUS options for Load Line Calibrations, Phase Control, Current Capabilities and Voltage Frequencies, for CPU, DRAM and VRM options.

Users have access to the ROG forums for extended guides on overclocking the MVF – we will cover our basic overclocking strategy later in the review.

Aside from overclocking, we have our usual array of BIOS options for controller and component settings.  In the Advanced menu there is access to SATA configurations (for RAID or IDE, AHCI by default), Intel RST, Intel SRT, iGPU configuration, forced PCIe lane speed settings, USB configurations, Controller (USB 3.0/SATA 6 Gbps/WiFi/BT/LAN/Audio) settings and LED control.  The last one is particularly useful if the onboard lights are a distraction in the evenings.

The BIOS also offers the wide array of monitoring menus, for voltages, temperatures (both included and optional sensors) and fan speeds.  The fan control settings are in the Monitor -> Fan Speed Control menu:

The fan controls in the BIOS are better than fan controls on most motherboards overall, however the ASUS package offers better fan control in the software package.  More on that in the software section of this review.

The Boot menu of the BIOS offers fast boot options, as well as boot order changes.  As ASUS has migrated to the CAP BIOS system, this should allow the motherboard to take full advantage of the fast booting options that Windows 8 offers, along with compatible hardware.  Fast booting into Windows 8 is great for those that use it.

The MVF BIOS also offers an EZ Flash Tool to update the BIOS, a series of OC Profiles to enable enthusiasts to save settings, a Go Button file to enable a one push overclock, and an SPD information tool.

Overall, the ASUS BIOS is well laid out and offers a wide variety of functionality.  In direct comparison to the ASRock Z77 OC Formula BIOS, I would give the nod on looks to the ASRock.  The ASRock offers a nice background (subjectively speaking), more detailed icons, more Auto-OC options, a few little quirky tools and more content on the screen due to the smaller font size.  The ASUS in contrast caters well for the overclocker wanting to push the boundaries with the wide variety of options.

ASUS Maximus V Formula Overview, Visual Inspection, Board Features ASUS Maximus V Formula Software
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • stefan from europe - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Thanks Ian for the review, but imo little late when in 2 months we have z87 on the way.
  • Razorbak86 - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Take it up with Asus. They just sent him the board for review. Perhaps they should have participated in the Z77 mobo round-up conducted months ago?
  • Jambe - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Quite the thoroughgoing review! Alas, I don't even consider standard ATX motherboards anymore, let alone EATX monsters.

    Still, it was a nice read, and the photos were lovely. That VRM cooler is neat...
  • Razorbak86 - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    The MVF is only 0.5" wider than ATX, and exactly the same height as ATX. For that reason, it will easily fit in most mid-tower ATX cases. Full-size E-ATX boards (e.g., some server boards) can be up to 3" wider than standard ATX width.
  • Jambe - Tuesday, March 26, 2013 - link

    Mm, yes, but as I said, I don't bother with even standard ATX motherboards or chassis these days. I'd wager that mATX can provide what the vast majority of tech DIYers and enthusiasts and I'd further say that mITX can suffice for virtually everyone else.

    From my perspective it's just an economy issue: if one doesn't need and won't use the space and expansion options of standard ATX (or larger) motherboards & chassis, why bother with either?
  • Razorbak86 - Wednesday, March 27, 2013 - link

    I wasn't trying to persuade you to buy the MVF. I was just trying to negate the implication that this board is an "EATX Monster", when it is actually much closer to ATX than EATX.
  • vvk - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    What is the point?
    Maybe I am little confused but considering Haswell is expected to come in 2months what is the point of buying this or any other ivy bridge MB now? Also considering how close all MBs game scores were investing in a better GPU would yield much grater benefits, per dollar.
  • 5150Joker - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    For people like me that built a desktop system a month ago and didn't want to wait on Haswell.
  • scook9 - Tuesday, March 26, 2013 - link

    Long time no see 5150Joker! I concur, I am reading this since I built my desktop in October with this board (with complete confidence in Asus) and wanted to see a good AT review to validate my decision :)
  • noeldillabough - Tuesday, March 26, 2013 - link

    And there is something to be said about a tested platform over a new unproven one. Bleeding edge causes some bleeding lol.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now