I think it’s safe to say that in 2018, the tablet market has not shaped up like anyone had expected, not even Apple. Tablets weren’t the next smartphone – and indeed the sales of dedicated tablets are downright soft – and yet at the same time tablets have successfully carved out a meaningful niche for themselves. But more importantly still, the tablet concept is everywhere even if “pure” tablets themselves aren’t. One needs only look at all the various PC 2-in-1s and convertibles to see the influence tablets have made on the traditional laptop market, forcing these many clamshells into becoming something more.

As a consequence of the introduction of modern tablets and their subsequent efforts to secure their own place in the market, we’ve essentially seen the tablet and tablet-alike market bifurcate into two real clusters of tablet designs. On the one hand are the cheap content consumption devices – the iPads, Fire TVs, and myriad of cheap Android tablets. On the other hand is the far more exclusive market for high-end, productivity-oriented tablets; devices that don’t just consume content, but create it as well. This market has been slower to develop, but it’s also important for its own reasons, as it’s the real crossover point between tablets as envisioned by the iPad, and the traditional PC laptop market.

Apple for their part has opted to go after both of these markets, and has done so successfully. The traditional 9.7-inch iPad needs no introduction, and while the iPad Pro is a little less known, the difference isn’t by much. Built upon the shoulders of the original iPad, the iPad Pro family takes things one step further, building towards not just a bigger and better iPad, but by giving the tablet the features that are needed for productivity and content creation, at both a hardware and a software level. The iPad Pro doesn’t try to be a traditional laptop, but it certainly tries to capture a lot of their usefulness, and this is especially the case for the 2018 iPad Pro.

With the introduction of the latest iPad Pro models, Apple’s iPad lineup for 2018 offers arguably the largest design change since the original iPad launched. The new design offers a much higher screen-to-body ratio than ever offered before, mimicking what they’ve done with the iPhone lineup. As a result, Apple has more or less reinvented the iPad Pro design, and offers plenty of new features inside and out.

Apple’s ambitions with the iPad Pro start with their chip design team, which has created the Apple A12X System on a Chip to power the latest iPad Pro. As outlined in our iPhone XS review, the A12 series of SoCs are already well ahead of the ARM competition, and Apple clearly has its sights on the performance levels of x86 CPUs from Intel. A12X features four Apple Vortex CPU cores, double that of the regular A12 in the iPhone, and seven A12 GPU cores which Apple says provides the power of an Xbox One S in a device with a far smaller power budget.

For better or worse, the iPad Pro is attached at the hip with Apple’s mobile operating system iOS, and unsurprisingly the iPad Pro ships with the latest version, iOS 12.1.

Apple’s iPad Pro lineup has also been their test bed for their newest display technology, and the iPad Pro keeps the 120 Hz ProMotion display, which offers variable refresh rate down to 24 Hz, along with P3 display gamut coverage tied in with their color managed software. Apple also keeps their True Tone option to dynamically adjust the white balance of the display to match the lighting conditions of the room it’s in.

Apple iPad Pro Comparison

  iPad Pro 11-Inch
iPad Pro 12.9-Inch
SoC Apple A12X
4x Apple Vortex
4x Apple Tempest

7 core A12 GPU
Display 11-inch
P3 D65, 120Hz
 P3 D65, 120Hz
Dimensions 247.6 x 178.5 x 5.9 mm
468 / 468 grams (WiFi / LTE)
280 x 214.9 x 5.9 mm
631 / 633 grams (WiFi / LTE)
RAM 4 GB (up to 512 GB Storage)
6 GB (1 TB model)
NAND 64GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
Battery 29.37 Wh 36.71 Wh
Front Camera 7MP, f/2.2, Smart HDR, Wide Color Gamut, Retina Flash
Rear Camera 12MP,  f/1.8, PDAF,
Smart HDR, Wide Color Gamut, True Tone Quad-LED flash
Cellular 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 16)
Intel XMM 7560 Modem
SIM Size NanoSIM
Wireless 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2x2 MIMO, BT 5.0, GPS/GLONASS
Connectivity USB-C
Apple Smart Connector
Launch OS iOS 12.1
Launch Price Wi-Fi:
$799 (64GB)
$949 (256GB)
$1149 (512GB)
$1549 (1TB)

Wi-Fi + LTE:
$949 (64GB)
$1099 (256GB)
$1299 (512GB)
$1699 (1TB)
$999 (64GB)
$1149 (256GB)
$1349 (512GB)
$1749 (1TB)

Wi-Fi + LTE:
$1149 (64GB)
$1299 (256GB)
$1499 (512GB)
$1899 (1TB)

Apple has also taken the opportunity to switch the iPad Pro lineup over from their proprietary Lighting connector to the more ubiquitous USB-C port, making this the first iOS device to offer USB connectivity. Where they give, they also take away though, and the 3.5 mm headset jack has gone the way of the Dodo, and for more or less the same reasons.

For those that want to work on the go, Apple continues its excellent tradition of offering cellular connectivity with the iPad Pro, and those that need a lot of storage will be happy to see models up to 1 TB, which is more important because the iPad offers no way to access external storage to increase this.

What first set the iPad Pro apart from the rest of the iPad lineup was the ability to use the Apple Pencil as well as a first-party keyboard solution. For the 2018 iPad Pro, both of these accessories have gotten refreshes as well.

The iPad Pro for 2018 is a major change from the outgoing models. Let’s dig in and see how it fares.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    Honestly wondered this too. Apple don't seem to like performance segmentation at the top-end, and I'd bet that 1TB unit uses TLC flash, so extra caching in system RAM would massively help performance and longevity. Just a supposition though.
  • Socius - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    I picked up the 1TB model for the 6GB of ram. Apps/games stay in memory far longer than they do on the iPhone XS Max with 4GB of ram. Of course, that could also be related to the way iOS is designed to perform on iphones vs. ipads. But either way, the 1TB model also has a much faster disk. If you use your iPad for productivity, I would try to find a way to justify the extra expenditure. My justification was the pending release of Adobe Photoshop, as well as trying to do some of my 4K video editing strictly on the iPad.
  • Speedfriend - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    If the single core power consumption is 3.6-4.3, what would it be at most stressed multicore?
  • eastcoast_pete - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    Writing this as somebody who is not an iOS fan or Apple fanboy, this tablet is clearly the reigning king of tablets, with the pricing to match. However, a laptop replacement it is not, despite what Apple keeps saying. The one aspect that I did find disappointing is the rear camera setup; despite statement by some of Apple's head-honchos, plenty of people I know do use their tablet (usually iPads) for photography, and for the current iPad Pro prices, Apple could have thrown in the camera setup from the iPhone XS.
  • KPOM - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    I think what Apple is saying is that it does what most people need a computer to do, not that it would replace everything a notebook does. For me, it does about 90% of what I need. This plus a low-end ultralight notebook with a big screen would be all I need right now. My employer insists on giving me a quad-core notebook that weighs a bulky 3.5 lbs. I’d take a Spectre over my PC setup. On business trips, the iPad is all I need.
  • WasHopingForAnHonestReview - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    So, email. K.
  • crash86 - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    On the GPU test - it looks like there is no change in resolution between the iPAD 1112x834 and 2224x1668 settings. Instead, it looks like the rendered resolution is exactly the same, just scaled by 2X (the @2.0?). Are you sure the rendered resolution actually changed between the tests? It seems unreasonable that the average / frame would be completely unchanged.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    We're sure.

    Take a good look at the photos. The Retina resolution photos are far clearer since they're not being internally rendered at 1/4 resolution.
  • tipoo - Tuesday, December 4, 2018 - link

    That's wild.

    *ask to render 4x more pixels*
    A12X: *Shrugs*
  • KateH - Wednesday, December 5, 2018 - link

    the author said the framerate appeared to be capped at 27fps (presumably for the sake of power consumption and thermals). So we don't know how fast it could render Civ at full tilt, only that it's at least 27fps at both resolutions. I assume this just means the GPU is just working less hard to hit the framerate at the lower resolution, but we don't know how much... Apple may have GPU design chops but even they can't magic their way out of resolution performance scaling limits, only obfuscate said limits ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now