As part of our ‘Best X’ range of pipeline posts, our focus turns on to the motherboard segment.  At this point of the year, we really are between a rock and a hard place, with new Z77 motherboards still being released, like the MSI Z77 Gaming range, and Haswell just around the corner.  Demand for new desktop systems is still going b, regardless of this looming upgrade – I have built two new Z77 systems in the last couple of week for family who wanted a computer today, not ‘in a few months’.

While we attempt to review a wide price range of motherboards at AnandTech, the skew is invariantly on the high end.  Manufacturers would rather we reviewed their best products to represent the best of the range, rather than get a perspective from a budget $75 model.  Recently we have covered the Z77 range of overclocking oriented models, but since Z77 release we have looked at the mITX range and also a wide series of new features on motherboards (for example Thunderbolt and PLX 8747).  The AMD side of the equation has been very light in terms of review coverage by virtue of the fact that there has been no real demand from either manufacturers or readers to cover motherboards made-for-Vishera/Piledriver, and any FM2 coverage seemed to lack excitement.

We have awarded a number of Z77 products with awards since the beginning of 2012, and here are our favorites north of $220. In later pieces we look at sub $220 models from Z77 and FM2, and another piece for our X79 picks.

AnandTech Silver Award: ASUS Maximus V Formula ($290 with AC3)

While the Formula doesn’t come cheap, and is in fact the most expensive Z77 motherboard without a PLX 8747 chip, it offers more of a package than any other non-PLX Z77 motherboard.  The big draws are the SupremeFX IV audio solution, capable of reaching the Realtek listed dynamic range and THD+N numbers, the combination air/water VRM heatsink, and the package as a whole.  In hardware we get an integrated WiFi/mPCIe combo card, an Intel NIC, extra SATA 6 Gbps, extra USB 3.0, options for overclockers and features such as BIOS Flashback.  The BIOS is geared for overclocking, with our CPU sample hitting highs rarely seen internally on any other motherboard – the BIOS also includes plenty of OC features for high end memory kits.  Software is similarly superb, with fan controls that actually act like fan controls should (see recent reviews for rants on this), network management, and features like USB 3.0 Boost.  Users also have access to the vast ROG forums for help and hints to get the perfect system.

Read our review of the ASUS Maximus V Formula here.

AnandTech Silver Award: ASRock Z77 OC Formula ($225)

In a similar vein to the ASUS MVF, the ASRock Z77 OC Formula is a great motherboard to play with and is easily the best ASRock motherboard I have ever used.  It dials in slightly cheaper than the ASUS (at the loss of some software control), but we still get plenty of overclock control, with the automatic options in the BIOS covering a wide range of clock speeds.  This allows users to select the first option, stress test, then move to the next – stopping when stability is not to the user’s liking.  The BIOS itself is so easy to use, and it looks a lot more polished than almost every other available on the market.  Software gets an OC Formula skin, and the XFast combination (RAM, LAN, USB) can help improve performance.  The ASRock has some benefits over the ASUS MVF – the ASRock has OC Touch buttons for that last competitive OC MHz and easier voltage check points.  For regular use the ASRock has more SATA ports, more USB 3.0 ports, PCIe disable switches, six USB 3.0 on the rear, and in the box we get a front USB 3.0 panel and motherboard standoffs for out-of-the box setups.

Read our review of the ASRock Z77 OC Formula here.

AnandTech Bronze Award: Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3 ($270)

Out of the PLX 8747 enabled motherboards we have tested on the Z77 platform, the Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3 has taken the lead in terms of layout, ease of user and performance.  Even though users will probably not be running at stock, the G1.Sniper 3 uses MultiCore Turbo to improve stock performance of the CPU above every other motherboard we have tested.  For gamers we have an Killer E2201-B network port alongside an Intel NIC, ten USB 3.0 ports, ten SATA ports, mSATA, PS/2 + Firewire connectivity, and a WiFi PCIe x1 card for users not using all the PCIe slots.  There is a TPM as well as an eSATA rear bracket for additional options.  While the PLX chip shows enhancements over non-PLX enabled three-way SLI/CFX and above, the option to have different PCIe layouts comes into force with PCIe SSDs or RAID cards.  The Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3 still offers the best price/performance ratio for a PLX 8747 enabled board, and with better BIOS/software integration would have got a bigger award.  This is something Gigabyte is working on for the future.

Read our review of the Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3 here

AnandTech Silver Award: ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe ($280)

Sweeping in at $280 is perhaps not the main price point for Z77, especially when there are motherboards that can run these processors for half the price.  However, this is where the P8Z77-V excels - for your extra money, you get a plethora of enthusiast related features that a user would not dream of on a half-price product.  Alongside the dual band WiFi, dual network controllers (one Intel, one Realtek), superior fan control and provision for a future Thunderbolt add-in card, we have the stalwarts of the ASUS arsenal, such as USB BIOS Flashback, Fan Xpert II, enhanced USB charging, USB 3.0 Boost, a well thought out BIOS and superior operating software.  The only features directly missing seem to be those that add a significant cost on board (PCIe PLX chip for >2 GPUs, a premium sound solution), where instead we would normally see products specifically focused for them in that price bracket.  As part of a long term, stable build, it is hard to put a foot wrong if you choose the P8Z77-V Deluxe. 

Read our review of the ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe here.

What To Look Forward To

Haswell is approaching, and each of the contenders here will have a Z87 counterpart.  Depending on the Z87 chipset itself, we may see more variation on how the motherboards line up, and whether each manufacturer will want to push up and down market segments.  Regardless of what media coverage says regarding the shift to more mobile devices, the high end desktop space is still b – enthusiasts want more and they want it now.  

As mentioned, our next ‘Best Motherboard’ feature will take a look at the $120-$200 market for both Z77 (regular + mITX) as well as an FM2 choice worth considering.  While no new X79 products are hitting the shelves, we have tested a fair number of X79 and Sandy Bridge-E is still the way to go for a multi-core Intel machine – stay tuned for that roundup as well.



Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Thursday, April 11, 2013 - link

    AT mostly reviews what vendors send in response to "we'd like to review on of your mobos"; so the better question might be why the oems aren't interested in having their mATX boards reviewed.
  • jtd871 - Thursday, April 11, 2013 - link

    Correction: AT reviewed one mATX Z77 mobo - Gigabyte GA-Z77MX-D3H
  • IanCutress - Thursday, April 11, 2013 - link

    I currently have two mATX on standby for review which I want to do by the end of the month: Maximus V Gene and G1.Sniper M3. I think mATX will be more of a focus on Haswell for sure.

    As for the comment about the Sabertooth, we tend not to get those unless we ask for it specifically. We tend to review the Pro and Deluxe first; I'll keep a note aside for Haswell.
  • madwolfa - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    Thanks, I think you're gonna love the V Gene. :)
  • marc1000 - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    great! I have real interest in mATX boards - the full ATX ones are "purely academical". mITX is cheaper and fits in smaller cases. If you get overclock out of the equation then this is a perfectly reasonable tradeoff.
  • Klug4Pres - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    Look, I love this site, but I don't really buy the idea that there is no demand from readers for Piledriver or FM2 reviews. I always hear bs justifications for focusing on the high-end, like "oh, that is what they sent us", or "this is an enthusiast site", but the fact is many people, including a significant proportion of enthusiasts, enjoy "bang-for-buck".

    Many times, you can justify a higher price if you need some feature; other times, you can be much better off going with a value board. The point is, it is helpful to know what the trade-offs are, and for that people need reviews. A site like Anandtech could do this, but I guess it would offend its advertisers. Let's call a spade a spade.
  • jtd871 - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    Klug4Pres- Review sites, and AT is no exception, are dependent on the manufacturers to send review samples. They don't always get what they ask for, either. AT takes (justifiable, I think) pride in not letting advertisers influence review content.

    Kudos to Ian - if you are a regular reader of his mobo reviews, you will know that he regularly criticizes the inclusion or omission of certain features (hw and sw) based on his judgment of the target audience for a particular board vis-a-vis the asking price.

    The fact that Ian is involved with competitive overclocking no doubt influences his perspective, and may even influence which boards vendors send him for review - although the latter may be a more difficult issue to verify/disprove (and if necessary, correct).
  • Klug4Pres - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    No, Anandtech is not dependent on manufacturers - it could just buy some stuff to review. It prides itself on being an independent site, so they need to think about what that means.
  • anonymous_user - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    Yes Anandtech could buy hardware to review but that costs money. Imagine if they had to buy every piece of hardware that users requested.
  • Klug4Pres - Friday, April 12, 2013 - link

    Yes, but imagine if they became even more respected as an independent and reliable review site (they are already among the best). They would get more traffic, which would pay for the hardware, and the lost revenue from the occasional disgruntled manufacturer.

    Anyway, they don't have to buy _all_ the hardware, still less "every piece of hardware that users requested". There is a middle ground, where they occasionally could buy hardware.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now