There's been a lot of talk lately about our position on removable storage and removable batteries in smartphones. Most of the discussion has centered around what we've said in podcasts or alluded to in reviews, so we figured it's a good time to have the complete discussion in one central location.

Let's get through the basics first:

All else being equal, removable storage and user replaceable batteries aren't inherently bad things. In fact, they can offer major benefits to end users. 

The key phrase however is "all else being equal". This is where the tradeoff comes in. On the battery front, the tradeoff is very similar to what we saw happen in notebooks. The move away from removable batteries allows for better use of internal volume, which in turn increases the size of battery you can include at the same device size. There are potential build quality benefits here as well since the manufacturer doesn't need to deal with building a solid feeling removable door/back of some sort. That's not to say that unibody designs inherently feel better, it's just that they can be. The tradeoff for removable vs. integrated battery is one of battery capacity/battery life on a single charge. Would you rather have a longer lasting battery or a shorter one with the ability the swap out batteries? The bulk of the market seems to prefer the former, which is what we saw in notebooks as well (hence the transition away from removable batteries in notebooks). This isn't to say that some users don't prefer having a removable battery and are fine carrying multiple batteries, it's just that the trend has been away from that and a big part of the trend is set based on usage models observed by the manufacturers. Note that we also don't penalize manufacturers for choosing one way or another in our reviews.

The tradeoffs are simple with an internal battery, the OEM doesn't need to include a rigid support structure on the battery to prevent bending, and doesn't need to replicate complicated battery protection circuitry, and can play with alternative 3D structures (so called stacked batteries) for the battery and mainboard as well. Personally, I'd rather have something that lasts longer on a single charge and makes better use of internal volume as that offers the best form factor/battery life tradeoff (not to mention that I'm unlikely to carry a stack of charged batteries with me). It took a while for this to sink in, but Brian's recommendation to charge opportunistically finally clicked with me. I used to delay charging my smartphone battery until it dropped below a certain level and I absolutely needed to, but plugging in opportunistically is a change I've made lately that really makes a lot of sense to me now.

The argument against removable storage is a similar one. There's the question of where to put the microSD card slot, and if you stick it behind a removable door you do run into the same potential tradeoff vs. build quality and usable volume for things like an integrated battery. I suspect this is why it's so common to see microSD card slots used on devices that also have removable batteries - once you make the tradeoff, it makes sense to exploit it as much as possible.

There's more to discuss when it comes to microSD storage however. First there's the OS integration discussion. Google's official stance on this appears to be that multiple storage volumes that are user managed is confusing to the end user. It's important to note that this is an argument targeted at improving mainstream usage. Here Google (like Apple), is trying to avoid the whole C-drive vs. D-drive confusion that exists within the traditional PC market. In fact, if you pay attention, a lot of the decisions driving these new mobile platforms are motivated by a desire to correct "mistakes" or remove painpoints from the traditional PC user experience. There are of course software workarounds to combining multiple types of storage into a single volume, but you only have to look at the issues with SSD caching on the PC to see what doing so across performance boundaries can do to things. Apple and Google have all officially settled on a single storage device exposed as a single pool of storage, so anything above and beyond that requires 3rd party OEM intervention.

The physical impact as well as the lack of sanctioned OS support are what will keep microSD out of a lot of flagship devices. 

In the Android space, OEMs use microSD card slots as a way to differentiate - which is one of the things that makes Android so popular globally, the ability to target across usage models. The NAND inside your smarpthone/tablet and in your microSD card is built similarly, however internal NAND should be higher endurance/more reliable as any unexpected failures here will cause a device RMA, whereas microSD card failure is a much smaller exchange. The key word here is should, as I'm sure there are tradeoffs/cost optimizations made on this front as well. 

The performance discussion also can't be ignored. Remember that a single NAND die isn't particularly fast, it's the parallel access of multiple NAND die that gives us good performance. Here you're just going to be space limited in a microSD card. Internal NAND should also be better optimized for random IO performance (that should word again), although we've definitely seen a broad spectrum of implementation in Android smartphones (thankfully it is getting better). The best SoC vendors will actually integrate proper SSD/NAND controllers into their SoCs, which can provide a huge performance/endurance advantage over any external controller. Remember the early days of SSDs on the PC? The controllers that get stuffed into microSD cards, USB sticks, etc... are going to be even worse. If you're relying on microSD cards for storage, try to keep accesses to large block sequentials. Avoid filling the drive with small files and you should be ok.

I fully accept that large file, slow access storage can work on microSD cards. Things like movies or music that are streamed at a constant, and relatively low datarate are about the only things you'll want to stick on these devices (again presuming you have good backups elsewhere).

I feel like a lot of the demand for microSD support stems from the fact that internal storage capacity was viewed as a way to cost optimize the platform as well as drive margins up on upgrades. Until recently, IO performance measurement wasn't much of a thing in mobile. You'd see complaints about display, but OEMs are always looking for areas to save cost - if users aren't going to complain about the quality/size/speed of internal storage, why not sacrifice a bit there and placate by including a microSD card slot? Unfortunately the problem with that solution is the OEM is off the hook for providing the best internal storage option, and you end up with a device that just has mediocre storage across the board.

What we really need to see here are 32/64/128GB configurations, with a rational increase in price between steps. Remember high-end MLC NAND pricing is down below $0.80/GB, even if you assume a healthy margin for the OEM we're talking about ~$50 per 32GB upgrade for high-speed, high-endurance internal NAND. Sacrifice on margin a bit and the pricing can easily be $25 - $35 per 32GB upgrade.

Ultimately this is where the position comes from. MicroSD cards themselves represent a performance/endurance tradeoff, there is potentially a physical tradeoff (nerfing a unibody design, and once you go down that path you can also lose internal volume for battery use) and without Google's support we'll never see them used in flagship Nexus devices. There's nothing inherently wrong with the use of microSD as an external storage option, but by and large that ship has sailed. Manufacturers tend to make design decisions around what they believe will sell, and for many the requirement for removable storage just isn't high up on the list. Similar to our position on removable batteries, devices aren't penalized in our reviews for having/not-having a removable microSD card slot.

Once you start looking at it through the lens of a manufacturer trying to balance build quality, internal volume optimization and the need for external storage, it becomes a simpler decision to ditch the slot. Particularly on mobile devices where some sort of a cloud connection is implied, leveraging the network for mass storage makes sense. This brings up a separate discussion about mobile network operators and usage based billing, but the solution there is operator revolution.

I'm personally more interested in seeing the price of internal storage decrease, and the performance increase. We stand to gain a lot more from advocating that manufacturers move to higher capacities at lower price points and to start taking random IO performance more seriously.

POST A COMMENT

376 Comments

View All Comments

  • JimmiG - Wednesday, December 4, 2013 - link

    Removable batteries have many advantages other than being able to carry a spare one and swap out (which I've never done, a universal, external battery is more convenient).

    -If you keep your phone for more than 12-18 months, the battery will begin to deteriorate. A fresh $25 battery will give you phone a new lease of life

    -If you don't mind having a slightly thicker phone, you can install a third party battery. For the Galaxy S3 I have, Samsung even sell an official 3000 mAh battery. It only adds a few millimeters to the thickness but increases battery life by 50%. If you're extremely demanding about battery life, there are some ludicrously oversized batteries you can buy. It gives you choice, which is why we go with Android over Apple in the first place.

    -Non user replaceable batteries is planned obsolescence at its worst. Your phone is literally designed to stop being usable after 12-18 months.
    Reply
  • rogekk - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    Its still a mixed feeling as i explained in my recent article about this topic (http://www.techjaja.com/tech-all-news/do-you-reall... but i feel we still need a big leap forward in battery technology and more cheaper inbuilt memory. Reply
  • SentinelBorg - Friday, December 6, 2013 - link

    Funny enough, this morning I got a Google Play Music update, that added support for SD card storage. ^^ Reply
  • Laphaswiff - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    audeamus igitur, iuvenes dum sumus; post iucundam iuventutem, post molestam senectutem nos habebit humus.

    Ubi sunt, qui ante nos in mundo fuere? Vadite ad superos, vadite ad inferos ubi iam fuere.

    Vita nostra brevis est, brevi finietur. Venit mors velociter, rapit nos atrociter, nemini parcetur.

    Vivat academia, vivant professores! Vivat membrum quodlibet, vivant membra quaeliber, semper sint in flore!

    Vivant omnes virgines, faciles formosae, vivant et mulieres, tenerae, amabiles, bonae, speciosae

    Vivat et respublica et qui illam regit, vivat nostra civitas Maecenatum caritas, quae nos hic protegit

    Pereat tristitia, pereant osores, pareat diabolus, quivis anti burschius atque irrisores.
    Reply
  • ASHH - Tuesday, December 10, 2013 - link

    what if your phone breaks or you soft brick or brick your phone and you didn't back up your device? For me this is why sd cards are crucial. Regardless of performance or not I don't backup my stuff every single day and what if I have no access to "Cloud" services. This is the main reason Phones should have sd slots. Peace of mind. Reply
  • artl - Wednesday, December 11, 2013 - link

    Cell phones do not cease functioning when powered-off. Many housekeeping choirs are going on, including reporting your tower location. To trully turn off, you must remove power source (battery). Reply
  • glenesis - Monday, December 23, 2013 - link

    I recently had the USB charging port on my phone fail. Without a way to charge nor a way to mount the phone on a computer, I had no way to easily retrieve my valuable files from my phone. When I received a replacement phone from my carrier, I was able to charge a battery with the replacement phone, move the battery into my damaged phone, and to copy the entire contents of my internal storage onto a 32gb MicroSD card. This is not even an argument or a discussion for me. I will not buy a device that has a unibody design. I have thoroughly learned the value of removable power and removable storage. I consider these things necessities. As for more an faster internal storage options? Yes, please, bring it on! I routinely fill my 32gb cards up. I'd love to have a 128gb storage capacity onboard, and a pair of Micro SDXC slots! Also, note that the first thing I do after I decide that I'm going to keep a new device is to buy the highest capacity extended battery that I can find. Having the option to upgrade my device is essential to me. Reply
  • IUU - Friday, December 27, 2013 - link

    Ok, there are obvious reasons why the manufacturers would opt for internal storage only, but you always end to a consumer losing.
    A device with external storage is dynamically a device that will serve the end user to the terabyte territory. The rule is that we are more attached to the content of our devices than the devices themselves. Such a device would generally last for inappropriately long time compared to the companies' sale cycle. Now we wouldn't want that , would we?
    A failing battery may be a decision for device changing, but having the option for easy battery
    replacement would generally lead to a longer time using the device. We wouldn't want this too, would we?
    Then there's the need for catering for the cloud thingy. If the end user is indepedent storage wise
    , then how will all these companies sell petty storage for gold?
    Reply
  • zangdook - Sunday, December 29, 2013 - link

    What about the ridiculous difficulty of transferring files between PC and phone? My experience is limited but on a Samsung device the procedure is deeply flawed. You have to install a crappy bloated media player on your PC and then you can transfer a limited range of media file types only (no .avi). For other filetypes they don't seem to want to let you do it. I just want to transfer any file I choose in either direction in a straightforward way. So I just pull out the sd card and plug it into the PC. Reply
  • signal121booster - Monday, January 13, 2014 - link

    Well, there is none kind of issue with the Google Nexus 5 smart phones. It is working perfect. As it comes with 16 GB memory, I don't need any more space. It is enough for me.

    cellphoneboosterstore
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now