The second of Intel’s enthusiast-based announcements after the unlocked Iris Pro coming to Broadwell is one regarding Intel’s new high performance platform. Currently we sit with socket LGA 2011 featuring Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E CPUs on top of the X79 chipset using DDR3 memory. Intel are confirming today that the next stage in that process will be Haswell-E, supported by the new X99 chipset and flanked with DDR4 memory.

The new processor line up will have an 8-core CPU at the top end, which Intel is calling their first ‘8-core desktop processor’ (strictly speaking Avoton is a server part). Given that the Xeon line of Ivy Bridge-E CPUs can hit 10, 12 and 15-core counts as we have reviewed, it should have been possible for Intel to consider these core counts for the enthusiast platform. However Intel has no competition in this area to innovate, so while core counts may rise on the Xeon side of the equation, for the consumer line we will have to wait longer for anything more than 8 cores.

The shift to DDR4 memory has been expected for a number of quarters. Speculation initially revolved around DDR4 coming earlier than Haswell-E, but we have to consider the enterprise market on this one. As many Ivy Bridge-E users have lamented, staying with the X79 platform has put consumers on the back foot when it comes to connectivity compared to the 8-series platform. X79 is down on USB 3.0 ports, SATA 6 Gbps ports and no mention of Flex-IO. So with X99 and DDR4, given that we expect to keep this platform for at least Haswell-E and Broadwell-E (potentially 2.5 to 3 years), it comes in now in preparation for the future platforms. We have seen DDR4 modules being tested at various trade shows, and I would imagine that most of the major memory partners (especially the enthusiast lines) are currently preparing kits.

The X99 platform is almost a complete unknown at this point. Given that Intel state that Haswell-E is planned for 2H 2014, we have had no information. In order to remain as the top end platform in the chipset sense (and not fall behind like X79), I would imagine X99 to take many cues from Z87 and even from the 9-series motherboards we have seen at CeBIT. This should mean a full complement of SATA 6 Gbps ports and USB 3.0 ports, with support for M.2, although we have no confirmation. Similarly while I would expect Flex IO to be present, allowing manufacturers to vary the number of PCIe 2.0 lanes from the chipset in exchange for SATA 6 Gbps ports and USB 3.0 ports, we also have no confirmation. In the past there have been X79 products with SAS support, although these were extra parts of the chipset that were not part of the validation process. It would be interesting to see if any of that functionality makes its way in. Flex IO seems like the future of flexible chipset design, and it would be interesting to see if Intel thinks this way as well.

As mentioned, and in the slide, Haswell-E is due in the second half of 2014. We unfortunately have no extra information on that date, but it confirms 2014 rather than 2015 which had been speculated.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • - Thursday, April 17, 2014 - link

    For those that cannot wait, I have posted the ultimate Dream Machine with every component you could think of all at drastically lowered prices if you should buy the combination. I am a bit behind in my posting here so I cannot put up an advertisement but if you visit the forum you can get a look. This deal is a gift to whoever it was made for. My wife and I are headed back to a work we started in Nepal in 1985 and this was a complete change in plans. So I sincerely hope that I will find the person who "needs" what I no longer "need" and would enjoy making someone's day very bright! Thanks and blessings.
  • I AM MY FATHERS SON - Monday, May 12, 2014 - link

    Garbage, garbage, garbage! Z87 was a real disappointment. Z97 looks even worse.

  • DnaAngel - Wednesday, May 21, 2014 - link

    There wasn't really any new technologies for Z87 to grasp. Another reason why it pays to only do new builds every 3-5 years. The only reason one would need to get Z87 was if they are coming from a much older platform. Of course there are 2 sides to every argument and the elitist who upgrade yearly will have something to say, but for the rest of us, money doesn't grow on trees and we have to be more strategic in upgrade cycles. My rule of thumb is to save up for a decent build with some longevity in mind, build it, then save for the next one in 3-5 years. $5-$10 out of each paycheck put away, adds up pretty good over that 3-5 years. Essentially funding the next upgrade and easy on the wallet, instead of forking out all at one time.
  • vknyvz - Friday, August 15, 2014 - link

    It's time to upgrade, I am still on my 950 yup 1st gen. Been waiting for the 5th Gen but my motherboard is crashing 5 times a day :(.

    All I need to know will the x99 chipset will support 5th Gen CPUs or there will be a new chipset. Or x99 will support Broadwell but there will also be another chipset (now i wouldn't like not having the latest) because I gotta update Haswell-E my system is crashing.... but when comes out I will definitely drop in a Broadwell.
  • Insight - Wednesday, August 27, 2014 - link

    In my thinking, back in the day, updating to a new computer was due to rapidly changing tech introducing new things. From monochrome and a 640Kb maximum memory limit in the old personal computer days up to just a few years ago. For everything I do on a computer I don't see a need for a new one any time soon. I am on the X58chipset with the 1366 socket. No games require a new chipset that I know of. I don't do photoshop or any other kinds of things that require resources that exceed those of my system. In the grand scheme of things, if it becomes faster and cheaper I would make the jump. So far I don't see anything newer that is that much faster and certainly is not cheaper.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now