Intel NUC5i7RYH Broadwell-U Iris NUC Review
by Ganesh T S on April 20, 2015 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Systems
- Intel
- HTPC
- NUC
- Broadwell-U
Introduction and Setup Impressions
Over the last couple of years, mini-PCs in the ultra-compact form factor (UCFF) have emerged as one of the bright spots in the troubled PC market. Intel's NUC systems are one of the most popular in this category. The lack of graphic prowess in the NUCs allowed for machines such as BRIX Pro (based on the Haswell Iris Pro CPU) to enter the market. With Broadwell, Intel is bringing out an Iris NUC on its own.
The 14nm Broadwell CPUs were introduced into the market with the Core M branding for fanless ultraportables. Essentially a rebranding of Y-series CPUs, its power efficiency got everyone excited about what a higher TDP version (U-series) could bring for the PC market. Even as ultrabooks based on Broadwell-U are getting ready for the market, Intel and its partners have started getting the UCFF units into the hands of consumers. Intel's Broadwell NUCs were introduced at CES 2015. We have already reviewed GIGABYTE's Core i7-5550U-based BRIX s and Intel's own Core i5-5250U-based NUC5i5RYK units, giving us some insight into how a 15 W TDP Broadwell-U might perform for common workloads. With Intel's partners launching UCFF PCs based on the U-series CPUs, it was always going to be interesting to see how they could differentiate their Broadwell NUCs. This review of the NUC5i7RYH - Intel's Core i7 Broadwell-U-based NUC with Iris Graphics 6100 - provides some insights.
Traditionally, the NUCs are barebones machines - the end-user could choose an appropriate mSATA SSD (or, for selected models, 2.5" drives), a mini-PCIe WLAN adapter, DDR3L SO-DIMMs and an operating system. Intel has two main changes in the barebones approach for the Broadwell-U NUCs: The WLAN adapter (Intel AC7265) now comes soldered to the motherboard. mSATA SSDs are no longer supported. In its place, we have support for either SATA or PCIe-based M.2 SSDs. Similar to the previous generation NUCs, a free SATA port is available on the board. The Iris NUC is sized to accommodate a 2.5' drive also. The SATA data and power cables are already routed and the appropriate chassis slots are in place to make adding a 2.5" drive very easy (as can be seen in the photograph below).
Intel also supplied us with a sample of Samsung's SM951 M.2 NVMe drive for use as the primary storage medium. The specifications of our Intel NUC5i7RYH review configuration are summarized in the table below.
Intel NUC5i7RYH Specifications | |
Processor | Intel Core i7-5557U (2C/4T x 3.1 GHz, 14nm, 4MB L2, 28W TDP) |
Memory | 2x 8GB DDR3L-1866 C13 |
Graphics | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 |
Disk Drive(s) | Samsung SM951 Series MZVPV256 256 GB M.2 NVMe SSD |
Networking | 1x Intel I218-V GbE, 2x2 Intel AC7265 802.11ac Wi-Fi |
Audio | Capable of 5.1/7.1 digital output with HD audio bitstreaming (HDMI) |
Operating System | Retail unit is barebones, but we installed Windows 8.1 Pro x64 |
Pricing (As configured) | $878 |
Full Specifications | Intel NUC5i7RYH Specifications |
The Intel NUC5i7RYH kit doesn't come with any pre-installed OS, but our pre-production engineering sample review unit came with a USB key containing the drivers. In addition to the main unit, the other components of the package include a 65 W (19V @ 3.43A) wall-wart (with detachable multi-country power plugs), a VESA mount (along with the necessary screws), setup guides and a QVL (qualified vendors list) for the memory and storage subsystems. The gallery below takes us around the chassis. The Wi-Fi module is underneath the M.2 SSD and not visible in the gallery photo.
The Iris NUC officially supports DDR3L SO-DIMMs at 1600 MHz. However, the BIOS automatically configures the memory for the highest possible speed. Our Crucial DIMM kits support running at up to 1866 MHz and they were automatically configured to run at that frequency with timings of 13-13-13-32 - this is much worse than the usual 1866 MHz kits that we have access to. However, given that memory overclocking is automatically configured, we evaluated the system with those timings.
In the table below, we have an overview of the various systems that we are comparing the Intel NUC5i7RYH against. Note that they may not belong to the same market segment. The relevant configuration details of the machines are provided so that readers have an understanding of why some benchmark numbers are skewed for or against the Intel NUC5i7RYH when we come to those sections.
Comparative PC Configurations | ||
Aspect | Intel NUC5i7RYH | |
CPU | Intel Core i7-5557U | Intel Core i7-5557U |
GPU | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 (Broadwell-H GT3) | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 (Broadwell-H GT3) |
RAM | Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 13-13-13-32 @ 1866 MHz 2x8 GB |
Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 13-13-13-32 @ 1866 MHz 2x8 GB |
Storage | Samsung SM951 Series MZVPV256 (256 GB; M.2 Type 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe; 19nm; MLC) |
Samsung SM951 Series MZVPV256 (256 GB; M.2 Type 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe; 19nm; MLC) |
Wi-Fi | Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (2x2 802.11ac - 867 Mbps) |
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (2x2 802.11ac - 867 Mbps) |
Price (in USD, when built) | $878 | $878 |
66 Comments
View All Comments
ganeshts - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
I can understand the issue for people who are following each and every review that is published here. On the other hand, many of our readers come from search results - say, someone searching on Google for 'Iris NUC review' - So, it is necessary for each review to be a 'standalone' piece ; I have published 10+ UCFF PC reviews in the last year or so. I would rather spend time writing about the actual benchmark results rather than thinking about 10 different ways to convey the same information.If you are a regular reader, the only item of interest in the introductory section would be the table listing the specs of the unit on a comparative basis. Feel free to skim over the introductory section and dive into the actual benchmark results if you are a regular reader.
keg504 - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
The title for the DiRT Showdown benchmarks is "Tomb Raider" for some reason...ganeshts - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
Thanks! Fixed ithlovatt - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
@ganeshts Any chance of a Mac Mini review to see how it stacks up in the HTPC stakes? After all the Mac Mini is one of the founders of this form factor.milkod2001 - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
i'll second that, please do review and comparison NUC vs Mac Mini if possible.zodiacfml - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
After all the Core M review these days, 28 watts appeared a performance monster at first glance.Yet, this is no Quad Core compared to previous similarly priced NUC. Not impressed.
meacupla - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
If you're talking about that Brix Pro, that thing was a beast and it consumes about 2x the power that this NUC does.zodiacfml - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 - link
True, but these devices are plugged in. For a notebook, I might reconsider.Pork@III - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
Weak is weak, if you will, and it names NUClear.meacupla - Monday, April 20, 2015 - link
If it said "NUClear" on the package, I would totally expect it to contain an R9 290X and subsequently melt down to a smouldering pile of plastic, silicon and PCB the moment it is subjected to ground breaking benchmarks.