NVIDIA Announces Tesla M40 & M4 Server Cards - Data Center Machine Learningby Ryan Smith on November 10, 2015 9:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- Machine Learning
Slowly but steadily NVIDIA has been rotating in Maxwell GPUs into the company’s lineup of Tesla server cards. Though Maxwell is not well-suited towards the kind of high precision HPC work that the Tesla lineup was originally crafted for, Maxwell is plenty suitable for just about every other server use NVIDIA can think of. And as a result the company has been launching what’s best described as new breeds of Maxwell cards in the last few months.
After August’s announcement of the Tesla M60 and M6 cards – with a focus on VDI and video encoding – NVIDIA is back today for the announcement of the next set of Tesla cards, the M40 and the M4. In what the company is dubbing their “hyperscale accelerators,” NVIDIA is launching these two cards with a focus on capturing a larger portion of the machine learning market.
|NVIDIA Tesla Family Specification Comparison|
|Tesla M40||Tesla M4||Tesla M60||Tesla K40|
|Stream Processors||3072||1024||2 x 2048
|Boost Clock(s)||~1140MHz||~1075MHz||~1180MHz||810MHz, 875MHz|
|Memory Clock||6GHz GDDR5||5.5GHz GDDR5||5GHz GDDR5||6GHz GDDR5|
|Memory Bus Width||384-bit||128-bit||2 x 256-bit||384-bit|
|VRAM||12GB||4GB||2 x 8GB
|Single Precision (FP32)||7 TFLOPS||2.2 TFLOPS||9.7 TFLOPS||4.29 TFLOPS|
|Double Precision (FP64)||0.21 TFLOPS (1/32)||0.07 TFLOPS (1/32)||0.3 TFLOPS (1/32)||1.43 TFLOPS (1/3)|
|Transistor Count||8B||2.94B||2x 5.2B||7.1B|
|Manufacturing Process||TSMC 28nm||TSMC 28nm||TSMC 28nm||TSMC 28nm|
|Target Market||Machine Learning||Machine Learning||VDI||Compute|
First let’s quickly talk about the cards themselves. The Tesla M40 marks the introduction of the GM200 GPU to the Tesla lineup, with NVIDIA looking to put their best single precision (FP32) GPU to good use. This is a 250 Watt full power and fully enabled GM200 card – though with Maxwell this distinction loses some meaning – with NVIDIA outfitting the card with 12GB of GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 6GHz. We know that Maxwell doesn’t support on-chip ECC for the RAM and caches, but it’s not clear at this time whether soft-ECC is supported for the VRAM. Otherwise, with the exception of the change in coolers this card is a spitting image of the consumer GeForce GTX Titan X.
Joining the Tesla M40 is the Tesla M4. As hinted at by its single-digit product number, the M4 is a small, low powered card. In fact this is the first Tesla card to be released in a PCIe half-height low profile form factor, with NVIDIA specifically aiming for dense clusters of these cards. Tesla M4 is based on GM206 – this being the GPU’s first use in a Tesla product as well – and is paired with 4GB of GDDR5 clocked at 5GHz. NVIDIA offers multiple power/performance configurations of the M4 depending on server owner’s needs, ranging from 50W to 75W, with the highest power mode rated to deliver up to 2.2TFLOPS of FP32 performance.
Both the Tesla M40 and M4 are being pitched at the machine learning market, which has been a strong focus for NVIDIA since the very start of the year. The company believes that machine learning is the next great frontier for GPUs, capitalizing on neural net research that has shown GPUs to be capable of both quickly training and quickly executing neural nets. Neural nets in turn are increasingly being used as more efficient means for companies to process vast amounts of audio & video data (e.g. the Facebooks of the world).
To that end we have seen the company focus on machine learning in the automotive sector with products such as the Drive PX system and lay out their long-term plans for machine learning with the forthcoming Pascal architecture at GTC 2015. In the interim then we have the Tesla M40 and Tesla M4 for building machine learning setups with NVIDIA’s current-generation architecture.
Given their performance and power profiles, Tesla M40 and M4 are intended to split the machine learning market on the basis of training versus execution The powerful M40 being well-suited for quicker training of neural nets and other systems, while the more compact M4 is well-suited for dense clusters of systems actually executing various machine learning tasks. Note that it’s interesting that NVIDIA is pitching the M40 and not the more powerful M60 for training tasks; as NVIDIA briefly discussed among their long-term plans at GTC 2015, current training algorithms don’t scale very well beyond a couple of GPUs, so users are better off with a couple top-tier GM200 GPUs than a larger array of densely packed GM204 GPUs. As a result the M40 occupies an interesting position as the company’s top Tesla card for machine learning tasks that aren’t trivially scalable to many GPUs.
Meanwhile, along with today’s hardware announcement NVIDIA is also announcing a new software suite to tie together their hyperscale ambitions. Dubbed the “NVIDIA Hyperscale Suite,” the company is putting together software targeted at end-user facing web services. Arguably the lynchpin of the suite is NVIDIA’s GPU REST Engine, a service for RESTful APIs to utilize the GPU, and in turn allowing web services to easily access GPU resources. NVIDIA anticipates the GPU REST Engine enabling everything from search acceleration to image classification, and to start things off they are providing the NVIDIA Image Compute Engine, a REST-capable service for GPU image resizing. Meanwhile the company is also be providing their cuDNN neural net software as part of the suite, and versions of FFmpeg with support for NVIDIA’s hardware video encode and decode blocks to speed up video processing and transcoding.
Wrapping things up, as is common with Tesla product releases, today’s announcements will predate the hardware itself by a bit. NVIDIA tells us that the Tesla M40 and the hyperscale software suite will be available later this year (with just over a month and a half remaining). Meanwhile the Tesla M4 will be released in Q1 of 2016. NVIDIA has not announced card pricing at this time.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
tipoo - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkI like their internal codenames too. Scientists is a good theme. Kepler, Fermi, Maxwell, etc.
mapesdhs - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkBlimey, good point, I hadn't noticed that before... Not seeing the wood for the trees as it were. :D
Flunk - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkBranding and success aren't always connected. Some of the most successful companies have terrible branding. Marketing people have a hugely inflated opinion of their relevance.
chlamchowder - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkThe K40 has a 1/3 FP64 ratio. So Maxwell can do a decent job at FP64. I wonder why that's not the case for any of the lower end Tesla cards though.
I also wonder how FP64 works on these cards. Are there distinct FP64 units? Or are several FP32 units combined to handle FP64?
Vatharian - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkThat's Kepler, not Maxwell
Dusk_Star - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkThe K40 is a Kepler card, though. As far as I know, all of the Maxwell cards, consumer or professional, are limited to 1/32 FP64 performance.
extide - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkThat's a Kepler card.
ajp_anton - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkAs others have pointed out, but I'll clarify by adding that the K in K40 stands for Kepler. Maxwell products start with M, Fermi started with F, etc. The chips also have the same letter codes, GM200 is Maxwell, GFxxx was Fermi.
frenchy_2001 - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkActually, the letter denomination in the quadro/tesla product started with Kepler K6000.
Before, they used pure number models:
Quadro X000 were Fermi (last generation with pure numbers), with 6000 being top model, 5000 below, 4000, 2000... Corresponding consumer cards being GF4XX and 5XX.
Quadro X800 were Tesla, with 5800 at top, 4800 below, 3800... Consumer card were GF2XX.
Quadro X600 were before with Quadro 5600/4600...
When Kepler arrived, they decided to add the letter and keep the round numbers:
K6000/K5000... for Kepler then M6000 for maxwell and so on. We can guess the next release should be P6000 for Pascal.
evilspoons - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - linkI know MSRP on these is in the "if you have to ask" territory, but that M4 sorta makes me want to use it as a PhysX card in a gaming PC... if it would actually do that (driver support).
I wonder what kind of insane rig you could build for BOINC with some of these running Seti@Home or similar. Again, not cost-effective, but it'd be fun.