Index
NVIDIA's Die Shrink: The 7900 and 7600
The Competition
The Test and Power
7900 GT: Just Another 7800 GTX?
Battlefield 2 High-End Performance
F.E.A.R. High-End Performance
Quake 4 High-End Performance
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory High-End Performance
Battlefield 2 Mid-Range Performance
F.E.A.R. Mid-Range Performance
Quake 4 Mid-Range Performance
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Mid-Range Performance
Quad SLI and Purevideo
Final Words
Quake 4 High-End Performance
F.E.A.R. High-End Performance
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory High-End Performance
Index
NVIDIA's Die Shrink: The 7900 and 7600
The Competition
The Test and Power
7900 GT: Just Another 7800 GTX?
Battlefield 2 High-End Performance
F.E.A.R. High-End Performance
Quake 4 High-End Performance
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory High-End Performance
Battlefield 2 Mid-Range Performance
F.E.A.R. Mid-Range Performance
Quake 4 Mid-Range Performance
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Mid-Range Performance
Quad SLI and Purevideo
Final Words
97 Comments
View All Comments
DigitalFreak - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
One of the reasons I just picked up 2 7900GTX boards. That, and I've been hearing of more and more problems with Crossfire.Rogue 2 - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
On "The Competition" page, they're showing the 7600GT w/ 256 bit memory bus, and the 6800GS w/ 128 bit memory bus. Isn't it exactly the opposite?DerekWilson - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
yes -- fixedDigitalFreak - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
Power test info is missing.DarthPierce - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
Yep... I see no graphs :)DerekWilson - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
fixedDarthPierce - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
I think the 7900GTX vs 7800 GTX512 graph is also missingDerekWilson - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
Do you mean 7900 GT vs. 7800 GTX? We didn't do a seperated 7800 GTX 512 vs. 7900 GTX comparison.BigLan - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
"Today marks the launch of NVIDIA's newest graphics cards: the 7900 GTX, 7900 GT and the 7900 GT."Should that be 7900 GT and the 7600 GT ?
SpaceRanger - Thursday, March 9, 2006 - link
That was the first thing I noticed too... Pretty obvious typo that should have been caught.