System Performance: Application-Specific Workloads

Standardized benchmarks such as UL's PCMark 10 and BAPCo's SYSmark take a holistic view of the system and process a wide range of workloads to arrive at a single score. Some systems are required to excel at specific tasks - so it is often helpful to see how a computer performs in specific scenarios such as rendering, transcoding, JavaScript execution (web browsing), etc. This section presents focused benchmark numbers for specific application scenarios.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R23

We use CINEBENCH R23 for 3D rendering evaluation. R23 provides two benchmark modes - single threaded and multi-threaded. Evaluation of different PC configurations in both supported modes provided us the following results.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R23 - Single Thread

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R23 - Multiple Threads

The performance in the multi-threaded case is a slam dunk for the GTR7. We see a significant improvement in the single thread scores over the Rembrandt-R systems, thanks to the higher power budget and newer microarchitecture (as well as faster RAM). However, the Raptor Lake-P NUCs seem to come away with the bragging rights for the single-threaded benchmark version.

Transcoding: Handbrake 1.5.1

Handbrake is one of the most user-friendly open source transcoding front-ends in the market. It allows users to opt for either software-based higher quality processing or hardware-based fast processing in their transcoding jobs. Our new test suite uses the 'Tears of Steel' 4K AVC video as input and transcodes it with a quality setting of 19 to create a 720p AVC stream and a 1080p HEVC stream.

Transcoding - x264

Transcoding - x265_10bit

The presence of eight high-performance cores in the GTR7 gives it a very good advantage for this multi-threaded benchmark. Higher power budget translates to higher performance given that most of the systems have the same core counts. The GTR7 has a well-defined lead over other UCFF systems, and is neck-to-neck against the Alder Lake SFF PC with a dedicated 65W budget for the CPU alone.

Transcoding - VCE H.264

Transcoding - VCE H.265

Hardware transcoding is available in the form of the VCE feature in the GPU. Intel systems have QuickSync, but a direct comparison is not advisable given that the encoding quality may differ. So, the comparison in the above graphs is restricted to AMD systems. The FPS is a function of the GPU clock rate and is directly tied to the available power budget. However, we do not find much difference in the transcoding rates between the Rembrandt-R and Phoenix systems.

Archiving: 7-Zip 21.7

The 7-Zip benchmark is carried over from our previous test suite with an update to the latest version of the open source compression / decompression software.

7-Zip Compression Rate

7-Zip Decompression Rate

While there is not much separating the different UCFF systems in terms of compression rates, decompression is a completely different story with the 65W Phoenix system enjoying close to a 25% advantage over the 35W Rembrandt-R systems.

Web Browsing: JetStream, Speedometer, and Principled Technologies WebXPRT4

Web browser-based workloads have emerged as a major component of the typical home and business PC usage scenarios. For headless systems, many applications based on JavaScript are becoming relevant too. In order to evaluate systems for their JavaScript execution efficiency, we are carrying over the browser-focused benchmarks from the WebKit developers used in our notebook reviews. Hosted at BrowserBench, JetStream 2.0 benchmarks JavaScript and WebAssembly performance, while Speedometer measures web application responsiveness.

BrowserBench - Jetstream 2.0

Raptor Lake-P seems to enjoy a slight advantage in single-threaded performance, and that gives the NUCs based on them an edge across all considered browsers in the JetStream 2.0 workload. The GTR7 slots in the upper half of the pack, with an improvement over the 35W Rembrandt-R systems. The same behavior is seen in the Speedometer 2.0 benchmark also.

BrowserBench - Speedometer 2.0

From a real-life workload perspective, we also process WebXPRT4 from Principled Technologies. WebXPRT4 benchmarks the performance of some popular JavaScript libraries that are widely used in websites.

Principled Technologies WebXPRT4

The GTR7 performs much better in this case, almost tying the ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1360P/D5 in performance across multiple browsers. The higher power budget gives the GTR7 an edge over the considered Rembrandt-R systems. Overall, JavaScript performance seems to be primarily impacted by single-threaded performance.

Application Startup: GIMP 2.10.30

A new addition to our systems test suite is AppTimer - a benchmark that loads up a program and determines how long it takes for it to accept user inputs. We use GIMP 2.10.30 with a 50MB multi-layered xcf file as input. What we test here is the first run as well as the cached run - normally on the first time a user loads the GIMP package from a fresh install, the system has to configure a few dozen files that remain optimized on subsequent opening. For our test we delete those configured optimized files in order to force a ???fresh load??? every second time the software is run.

AppTimer: GIMP 2.10.30 Startup

As it turns out, GIMP does optimizations for every CPU thread in the system, which requires that higher thread-count processors take a lot longer to run. So the test runs quick on systems with fewer threads, however fast cores are also needed. While the GTR7 is better than the Rembrandt-R systems on both counts, the Intel-based NUCs turn up with faster application launches under the considered conditions.

Cryptography Benchmarks

Cryptography has become an indispensable part of our interaction with computing systems. Almost all modern systems have some sort of hardware-acceleration for making cryptographic operations faster and more power efficient. In the case of IoT servers, many applications - including web server functionality and VPN - need cryptography acceleration.

BitLocker is a Windows features that encrypts entire disk volumes. While drives that offer encryption capabilities are dealt with using that feature, most legacy systems and external drives have to use the host system implementation. Windows has no direct benchmark for BitLocker. However, we cooked up a BitLocker operation sequence to determine the adeptness of the system at handling BitLocker operations. We start off with a 4.5GB RAM drive in which a 4GB VHD (virtual hard disk) is created. This VHD is then mounted, and BitLocker is enabled on the volume. Once the BitLocker encryption process gets done, BitLocker is disabled. This triggers a decryption process. The times taken to complete the encryption and decryption are recorded. This process is repeated 25 times, and the average of the last 20 iterations is graphed below.

BitLocker Encryption Benchmark

BitLocker Decryption Benchmark

Hardware acceleration is available for the operations in all of the systems. The time taken for processing is directly dependent on the RAM speeds, available power budget, and core counts. As a result, it is no surprise that the GTR7 with DDR5-5600 RAM, 65W budget and eight high-performance cores manages to take the top spot by a comfortable margin.

System Performance: UL and BAPCo Benchmarks GPU Performance: Synthetic Benchmarks
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gm2502 - Friday, August 25, 2023 - link

    Games, productivity or anything else the VAST majority of the world does when they don't have to run on a proprietary, non-upgradable glorified mobile phone. This Miniforum is superior in EVERY metric mate, so take your fan boy rubbish elsewhere.
  • darkswordsman17 - Friday, August 25, 2023 - link

    "Glorified mobile phone" despite this not being in a phone, and the reason the AMD chip isn't is because its literally incapable of being put in such a form factor due to the power and thermal limits still exceeding what a phone could deal with. And the M2 chip is still competitive enough that its not ridiculous to compare them.

    There's definitely flaws (and plenty of legitimate criticisms of Apple/Apple product), but anyone acting like there aren't flaws with the PC side is just delusional. Acting like you can't do anything more than run a few proprietary apps on Apple stuff is so ridiculously nonsensical at this point that you really need to look in the mirror. Yes, lemurbutton is ridiculously nonsensical, but going the total opposite direction is just as pointless and biased.

    Heck, is no one going to call out the proprietary power connector on this? That alone stopped me from considering this over its competition, and is just absurd in this market space.

    Further, Apple could make the Mini even smaller (there is a YouTube where someone does exactly that, I think it ended up roughly 3/5 the size, maybe even smaller) with no real performance loss. That'd put it roughly 1/4 the size of this box. Try putting Phoenix in such and the M2 would probably outperform it.
  • Gm2502 - Saturday, August 26, 2023 - link

    Roflol, so ARM architecture isn't synonymous with mobile technologies? Literally accounts for over 95% of ARM sales, so my statement about it being a glorified mobile phone isn't far off. The M2 Chip is not even close to be competitive, with cpu performance difference from Tomshardware - "The Ryzen 7 7840U was anywhere from 15-71% faster than the M2" and The Ryzen 7 7840U was anywhere from 35 - 180% faster than the M2" in graphics testing. So again, if it wasn't for the stupid propietry OS optimised for the iPhone reject chip, it wouldnt even be a comparison.

    As for size, again your lying about a mac mini being 1/4 the size. M2 Mini - 197mm x 197mm x 36mm, this GTR7 box is 168mmx120mmx49mm, so cut the crap there. This thing is roughly the same size as the Mac Mini. You complain about design choices, well you literally have hundreds of designs for tens of companies to choose from, each with different hardware (like use a DIN plug is a big deal, but fanboyz have to clutch at straws), all of which can be upgraded and user repaired. Want more RAM or storage on a M2, go buy a new PC.

    Want freedom of choice to run any application and game, go windows. If you go apple, pray it works if its not on the very specific optimised for MacOS list, and good thing most games don't run in it becuase the god awful IGPU of the M2 won't be able to produce much more then a slide show, unless I look to double or quadruple the price and look at M2 Pro or ultra equiped M2 machine, which will be roughly 5-10 x the price is this machine...

    So again, calling you and your "facts" as fanboyism not grrounded in any reality. Especially stuoid when you comment on a single PC manafacturer design choices knowing full well that PC allows choice across multiple manafacturers while Apple if wholly proprietary. Stupid argument across the board.
  • Samus - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    You can upgrade it to Windows 10 and it'll be solid.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    The M2 has 4x P-cores and 4x E-cores. Is that really faster than 8x dual-threaded Zen 4 cores?

    > has AI inference

    Phoenix features AMD's new "Ryzen AI" accelerator. I don't know how they compare, but if you're running Windows or Linux, you'll probably find AMD's solution better supported than Apple's.

    I think that's the key. If you *want* to run MacOS, then you'll do better with the M2 mini. If you'd rather run Linux or Windows, then it's really no contest. Recent benchmarks of the M2 running Linux have shown that its Linux support has a long ways to go, before it's remotely competitive.

    https://www.phoronix.com/review/apple-m2-zen4-mobi...
  • dontlistentome - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    Have you any concept of how bored we are of these comments about Macs?
  • Qasar - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    keep in mind lemurbutton is paid by apple to post how great their products are, while posting no proof or anything.
    you wouldnt want him to get punished by his apple overlords, would you???
  • bji - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    Do you have proof of that or are you just talking out of your ass?
  • Qasar - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    have you seen his other posts ? nothing but pro apple, amd and intel suck and cant compete with m1/m2/m3/ etc on any level

    he mostly talks out of his ass when it comes to apple
  • PeachNCream - Friday, August 25, 2023 - link

    Not a paid shill, I would think, but someone just having fun with the bags of hammers that read Anandtech that fall for trolling every. single. time.

    Wouldn't you keep that up if you didn't need to change tactics and could "outsmart" your audience while gaining imaginary internet attention to feel good about yourself?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now