System Performance: Application-Specific Workloads

Standardized benchmarks such as UL's PCMark 10 and BAPCo's SYSmark take a holistic view of the system and process a wide range of workloads to arrive at a single score. Some systems are required to excel at specific tasks - so it is often helpful to see how a computer performs in specific scenarios such as rendering, transcoding, JavaScript execution (web browsing), etc. This section presents focused benchmark numbers for specific application scenarios.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R23

We use CINEBENCH R23 for 3D rendering evaluation. R23 provides two benchmark modes - single threaded and multi-threaded. Evaluation of different PC configurations in both supported modes provided us the following results.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R23 - Single Thread

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R23 - Multiple Threads

The performance in the multi-threaded case is a slam dunk for the GTR7. We see a significant improvement in the single thread scores over the Rembrandt-R systems, thanks to the higher power budget and newer microarchitecture (as well as faster RAM). However, the Raptor Lake-P NUCs seem to come away with the bragging rights for the single-threaded benchmark version.

Transcoding: Handbrake 1.5.1

Handbrake is one of the most user-friendly open source transcoding front-ends in the market. It allows users to opt for either software-based higher quality processing or hardware-based fast processing in their transcoding jobs. Our new test suite uses the 'Tears of Steel' 4K AVC video as input and transcodes it with a quality setting of 19 to create a 720p AVC stream and a 1080p HEVC stream.

Transcoding - x264

Transcoding - x265_10bit

The presence of eight high-performance cores in the GTR7 gives it a very good advantage for this multi-threaded benchmark. Higher power budget translates to higher performance given that most of the systems have the same core counts. The GTR7 has a well-defined lead over other UCFF systems, and is neck-to-neck against the Alder Lake SFF PC with a dedicated 65W budget for the CPU alone.

Transcoding - VCE H.264

Transcoding - VCE H.265

Hardware transcoding is available in the form of the VCE feature in the GPU. Intel systems have QuickSync, but a direct comparison is not advisable given that the encoding quality may differ. So, the comparison in the above graphs is restricted to AMD systems. The FPS is a function of the GPU clock rate and is directly tied to the available power budget. However, we do not find much difference in the transcoding rates between the Rembrandt-R and Phoenix systems.

Archiving: 7-Zip 21.7

The 7-Zip benchmark is carried over from our previous test suite with an update to the latest version of the open source compression / decompression software.

7-Zip Compression Rate

7-Zip Decompression Rate

While there is not much separating the different UCFF systems in terms of compression rates, decompression is a completely different story with the 65W Phoenix system enjoying close to a 25% advantage over the 35W Rembrandt-R systems.

Web Browsing: JetStream, Speedometer, and Principled Technologies WebXPRT4

Web browser-based workloads have emerged as a major component of the typical home and business PC usage scenarios. For headless systems, many applications based on JavaScript are becoming relevant too. In order to evaluate systems for their JavaScript execution efficiency, we are carrying over the browser-focused benchmarks from the WebKit developers used in our notebook reviews. Hosted at BrowserBench, JetStream 2.0 benchmarks JavaScript and WebAssembly performance, while Speedometer measures web application responsiveness.

BrowserBench - Jetstream 2.0

Raptor Lake-P seems to enjoy a slight advantage in single-threaded performance, and that gives the NUCs based on them an edge across all considered browsers in the JetStream 2.0 workload. The GTR7 slots in the upper half of the pack, with an improvement over the 35W Rembrandt-R systems. The same behavior is seen in the Speedometer 2.0 benchmark also.

BrowserBench - Speedometer 2.0

From a real-life workload perspective, we also process WebXPRT4 from Principled Technologies. WebXPRT4 benchmarks the performance of some popular JavaScript libraries that are widely used in websites.

Principled Technologies WebXPRT4

The GTR7 performs much better in this case, almost tying the ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1360P/D5 in performance across multiple browsers. The higher power budget gives the GTR7 an edge over the considered Rembrandt-R systems. Overall, JavaScript performance seems to be primarily impacted by single-threaded performance.

Application Startup: GIMP 2.10.30

A new addition to our systems test suite is AppTimer - a benchmark that loads up a program and determines how long it takes for it to accept user inputs. We use GIMP 2.10.30 with a 50MB multi-layered xcf file as input. What we test here is the first run as well as the cached run - normally on the first time a user loads the GIMP package from a fresh install, the system has to configure a few dozen files that remain optimized on subsequent opening. For our test we delete those configured optimized files in order to force a ???fresh load??? every second time the software is run.

AppTimer: GIMP 2.10.30 Startup

As it turns out, GIMP does optimizations for every CPU thread in the system, which requires that higher thread-count processors take a lot longer to run. So the test runs quick on systems with fewer threads, however fast cores are also needed. While the GTR7 is better than the Rembrandt-R systems on both counts, the Intel-based NUCs turn up with faster application launches under the considered conditions.

Cryptography Benchmarks

Cryptography has become an indispensable part of our interaction with computing systems. Almost all modern systems have some sort of hardware-acceleration for making cryptographic operations faster and more power efficient. In the case of IoT servers, many applications - including web server functionality and VPN - need cryptography acceleration.

BitLocker is a Windows features that encrypts entire disk volumes. While drives that offer encryption capabilities are dealt with using that feature, most legacy systems and external drives have to use the host system implementation. Windows has no direct benchmark for BitLocker. However, we cooked up a BitLocker operation sequence to determine the adeptness of the system at handling BitLocker operations. We start off with a 4.5GB RAM drive in which a 4GB VHD (virtual hard disk) is created. This VHD is then mounted, and BitLocker is enabled on the volume. Once the BitLocker encryption process gets done, BitLocker is disabled. This triggers a decryption process. The times taken to complete the encryption and decryption are recorded. This process is repeated 25 times, and the average of the last 20 iterations is graphed below.

BitLocker Encryption Benchmark

BitLocker Decryption Benchmark

Hardware acceleration is available for the operations in all of the systems. The time taken for processing is directly dependent on the RAM speeds, available power budget, and core counts. As a result, it is no surprise that the GTR7 with DDR5-5600 RAM, 65W budget and eight high-performance cores manages to take the top spot by a comfortable margin.

System Performance: UL and BAPCo Benchmarks GPU Performance: Synthetic Benchmarks
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • darkswordsman17 - Friday, August 25, 2023 - link

    Apple doesn't need to pay anyone, nor would they have someone posting in such a manner even if they did, let alone on a niche PC tech website that's long past its glory days.
  • 1_rick - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    "It's superior to this in just about every way."

    Not if I don't want to run MacOS.
  • StormyParis - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    The 7840hs seems to be
    - on par for single-core work
    - 1.5 to 2x faster for multi-core
    - 1.5x faster for graphics
    - also it takes more and/or upgradeable RAM, storage, I/O, OSes...

    https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m2-vs-...
  • Gm2502 - Sunday, August 27, 2023 - link

    Are youj high, where in the world is a M2 faster then this 😂😂😂😂. All the benchmarks show this destroying M2 in every way, it can be upgraded, repaired and run windows. Another apple fanboy 😂😂😂
  • bsd228 - Monday, August 28, 2023 - link

    That 499 price is true for the basic model no one in their right mind wants, but the discount drops once you try to add on the other wants. The 16gb model is discounted 50, but that still makes it a $250 upgrade. If you want more disk, you're back to the 599 msrp plus the Apple charge. If you want 10gb over the weak 1gb, you're definitely paying msrp.

    The 5800u is a not quite at the 7840, but $350 for it with 32gb, 2x2.5gb and 500gb (replaceable) ssd is a much better docker box than the apple could ever hope to be.
  • BangkokTom - Tuesday, August 29, 2023 - link

    ...takes M2 mini apart, oh purposely bricked (this is a joke with Crapple's fix it yourself policy by the way)
  • sjkpublic@gmail.com - Friday, September 1, 2023 - link

    Ignore this person. Just a shil for the Apple monopoly.
  • Threska - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    Kind of funny in a way. We've gone from obsessing with big computers to seeing how much computing we can squeeze into as small a space as possible.
  • 5080 - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    Would be nice to see a build quality review and comparison between this and the SimplyNUC (Moonstone), Morefine (M600), and MinisForum (UM790 Pro) NUC's.
  • NextGen_Gamer - Thursday, August 24, 2023 - link

    Yes! Also, I really want these guys to release them barebones, so I can put in my own RAM/SSD (without wasting money on the included ones). I got in touch with Morefine, and they told me they are no longer releasing the M600 barebones and only as a full kit now (if you check their website, you see this is true).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now